Fair financing of health costs

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Social association "Volkssolidarität" for fair financing of health costs

"The massive introduction of additional contributions is an expression of a failed policy of shifting health costs unilaterally to the insured," said the federal manager of the Social and Welfare Association for People's Solidarity, Dr. Bernd Niederlande, on Friday, on reports about the threat of additional health insurance contributions. "The social imbalance must not be further increased. Income-independent flat-rate fees are the wrong way. The privatization of health costs must be countered by fair financing based on the economic performance of the insured."

The people's solidarity warned of the social consequences of the additional contributions, so the Netherlands. "For many, an additional contribution of eight euros may be manageable. But large parts of the population have not benefited from the tax relief on January 1, 2010 because their income is far too low. Those who have to live on 700 or 800 euros per month are like many pensioners ,
Low-wage earners and the unemployed must save these eight euros from their mouths. And even those who earn better can now pay the additional contribution from the tax relief - true to the motto "left pocket right pocket". "

"People's solidarity is calling for people to go the wrong way, to burden the insured more and more unilaterally, the Netherlands made clear." Popular solidarity sets three priorities for fair financing of health costs: First, employers must stay on board. That is why we want equal financing for wages. Employers must not be relieved of responsibility for future healthcare costs.

This also includes reassigning the special contribution of 0.9 percent to be paid by the insured to the equal total contribution. Second, the lack of solidarity between statutory and private health insurance must be overcome. It is absurd that recipients of higher incomes can evade solidarity by switching to private health insurance, especially in times of crisis. That only strengthens a two-tier medicine. It is also necessary to include private health insurance in the risk structure compensation.

Thirdly, in addition to earned income, other types of income must also be given greater consideration, in particular from assets, renting and leasing. It is not about the interest income of the savers for which tax exemptions can be provided, but about a greater consideration of high profits when financing health. The tax subsidies of almost 16 billion euros planned for 2010 are "peanuts" in comparison to the hundreds of billions of euros to support the banking system. (22/01/2010)

Author and source information

Video: True cost of US healthcare shocks the British public

Previous Article

Ginkgo extracts for dementia

Next Article

Success in losing weight measurable